Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Дата
Msg-id 16279.1557520158@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-05-07 09:17:11 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Well, it rejiggers the way table locks are acquired for all REINDEX
>> INDEX commands, not just in the CONCURRENTLY. But yea, it's probably
>> easy to catch issues there on user tables.

> Pushed now.

OK.  I marked the open issue as closed.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"