Re: Coalesce bug ?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Coalesce bug ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16273.1356106553@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Coalesce bug ? ("David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Coalesce bug ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com> writes:
> The first case is:
> SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT), (SELECT) ); I am not sure exactly what the parentheses surrounding the scalar-sub-SELECTs
do(turn them into anonymously typed rows?) but if the first scalar-sub-select results in a non-null result then the
secondone should not be executed.
Indeed, COALESCE will not execute the second sub-select at runtime, but
that doesn't particularly matter here. What matters is that "ps3(2)"
qualifies to be pre-evaluated (folded to a constant) at plan time. So
that happens, and the RAISE message comes out, at plan time. What's
left at run time is
SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT 1), (SELECT 2) );
and indeed the "SELECT 2" is skipped at that point, as is visible in the
EXPLAIN ANALYZE measurements.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: