Re: MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?
Дата
Msg-id 16259.1124725300@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?  ("Jignesh Shah" <jigneshk@hotmail.com>)
Ответы Re: MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Re: MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?  ("Jignesh Shah" <jigneshk@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Jignesh Shah" <jigneshk@hotmail.com> writes:
> Running a script (available on my blog) I find the following top 5 functions
> where it spends most time during a 10 second run of the script

It's pretty risky to draw conclusions from only 10 seconds' worth of
gprof data --- that's only 1000 samples total at the common sampling
rate of 100/sec.  If there's one function eating 90% of the runtime,
you'll find out, but you don't have enough data to believe that you
know what is happening with resolution of a percent or so.  I generally
try to accumulate several minutes worth of CPU time in a gprof run.

> MemoryContextSwitchTo and LockBuffer itself takes 15% of the total time of
> the query. I was expecting "read" to be the slowest part (biggest component)
> but it was way down in the 0.4% level.

You do know that gprof counts only CPU time, and only user-space CPU
time at that?  read() isn't going to show up at all.  It's fairly likely
that your test case is I/O bound and that worrying about CPU efficiency
for it is a waste of time anyway.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeremiah Jahn
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: extremly low memory usage
Следующее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MemoryContextSwitchTo during table scan?