Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've gone through this, and found only a couple of things that seemed
>> worth migrating into the 7.3 docs. Perhaps I just have a low tolerance
>> for silliness tonight, but it seemed like the average quality of the
>> comments was a lot lower than in previous release cycles :-(
> It is possible our docs are getting clearer and there is less fiddling
> to do.
Or I'm just being a jerk tonight. Anyone else care to make a pass
through the comments? It seemed like an awful lot of the stuff that
was credible at all was "point <foo> should be mentioned over here in
part <bar>", which I mostly didn't agree with, but maybe someone else
would see it differently.
regards, tom lane