Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade --jobs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16144.1554588125@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade --jobs (senor <frio_cervesa@hotmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
senor <frio_cervesa@hotmail.com> writes:
> Since pg_upgrade is in control of how it is calling pg_dump, is there a reason pg_upgrade cannot use the directory
outputformat when calling pg_dump? Is the schema-only operation incompatible?
Well, there's no point in it. pg_dump can only parallelize data dumping,
and there's none to be done in the --schema-only case that pg_upgrade
uses.
Also, since pg_upgrade *does* use parallelism across multiple pg_dump
calls (if you've got multiple databases in the cluster), it'd be a bit
problematic to have another layer of parallelism below that, if it did
indeed do anything. You don't want "--jobs=10" to suddenly turn into
100 sessions.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: