ExecMakeTableFunctionResult vs. pre-evaluated functions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | ExecMakeTableFunctionResult vs. pre-evaluated functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16109.1038723695@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: ExecMakeTableFunctionResult vs. pre-evaluated functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I've spent today messing with making the planner substitute inline
definitions of simple SQL functions, per the comment in
src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c:
* XXX Possible future improvement: if the func is SQL-language, and its* definition is simply "SELECT expression", we
couldparse and substitute* the expression here. This would avoid much runtime overhead, and perhaps* expose
opportunitiesfor constant-folding within the expression even if* not all the func's input args are constants. It'd be
appropriateto do* that here, not in the parser, since we wouldn't want it to happen until* after rule
substitution/rewriting.
It seems to work 99%, but I'm seeing this failure in the regression
tests:
CREATE FUNCTION getfoo(int) RETURNS int AS 'SELECT $1;' LANGUAGE SQL; SELECT * FROM getfoo(1) AS t1;
! ERROR: ExecMakeTableFunctionResult: expression is not a function call
which of course happens because the table-function expression has been
reduced to just a constant "1" by the time the executor sees it.
A grotty answer is to not apply constant-expression folding to table
function RTE entries. A better answer would be to make
ExecMakeTableFunctionResult more flexible, but I'm not quite sure what
it should do if presented a non-function-call expression tree. Any
thoughts?
regards, tom lane
PS: another little problem isregression=# explain SELECT * FROM getfoo(1) AS t1;server closed the connection
unexpectedly
but I'm sure that's just a lack of flexibility in explain.c ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: