Re: Reducing the log spam
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reducing the log spam |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 160c5b1e-40d1-4205-be5b-0e673b5aa167@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reducing the log spam (Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reducing the log spam
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025/03/17 17:12, Jim Jones wrote: > > On 15.03.25 07:12, Laurenz Albe wrote: >> ... and here is v7, improved in the spirit of >> https://postgr.es/m/E132D362-A669-4606-AFE1-B45C9DFCC141%40yesql.se > > > I just revisited this patch and v7 passes all tests from [1,2]. > LGTM. Since this patch is marked as ready for committer, I've started looking at it. Filtering log messages by SQLSTATE might be useful for some users, but I'm unsure if it should belong in the core. There are also other potential filtering needs, such as by application name, client host, database, or roles. Adding only SQLSTATE filtering may not be good idea, while supporting all possible cases in the core wouldn't be practical either. Given that, I think implementing this as an extension using emit_log_hook would be a better approach. Anyway, I'd like to hear more opinions from other hackers on this. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: