Re: pg18 bug? SELECT query doesn't work
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg18 bug? SELECT query doesn't work |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1607957.1767725532@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg18 bug? SELECT query doesn't work (Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg18 bug? SELECT query doesn't work
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> writes:
> Here's an even more reduced test case. No tables or data:
> # SELECT * FROM (SELECT upper(unnest(ARRAY['cat', 'dog'])) as animal FROM generate_series(1, 10) GROUP BY 1) x WHERE
animalilike 'c%';
> pg15 returns:
> animal
> --------
> CAT
> (1 row)
> and pg18 says:
> # SELECT * FROM (SELECT upper(unnest(ARRAY['cat', 'dog'])) as animal FROM generate_series(1, 10) GROUP BY 1) x WHERE
animalilike 'c%';
> ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
> LINE 1: SELECT * FROM (SELECT upper(unnest(ARRAY['cat', 'dog'])) as ...
> ^
I agree that this is a bug. "git bisect" says it broke at
247dea89f7616fdf06b7272b74abafc29e8e5860 is the first bad commit
commit 247dea89f7616fdf06b7272b74abafc29e8e5860 (HEAD)
Author: Richard Guo <rguo@postgresql.org>
Date: Tue Sep 10 12:35:34 2024 +0900
Introduce an RTE for the grouping step
I've not probed further than that, but my guess is that now we check
for set-returning tlist items while the tlist still has grouping Vars,
thus missing the fact that there's a SRF represented by one of those
Vars. This prompts us to flatten a subquery we shouldn't have
flattened (because that ends by introducing a SRF into the outer
WHERE).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: