I wrote:
> Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> writes:
>> Binary send and recv of the value at hand would change it into a 0-D vector.
> The reason for that is that in general we don't make a distinction
> between zero-size arrays of different dimensions.
Actually, after consuming a bit more caffeine, I see what Yeb is on about.
Even though the system in general doesn't make much of a distinction
between zero-element arrays of different dimensionalities, there *are*
functions that can distinguish --- array_ndims() being the most obvious
one. Shouldn't we ensure that binary dump and reload of an array value
doesn't change the value in any SQL-observable way? If so, I think his
patch is correct, even though it's changing more than just the
originally-complained-of behavior.
While I'm looking at this ... why is it that array_ndims returns NULL
and not 0 for a zero-dimensional array? 0-D arrays might have been
unsupported at one time, but they're certainly considered valid now.
regards, tom lane