Re: Split-up ECPG patches

Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> Tom, AFAICT we only need one core grammar change, moving the cursor name to
> it's own rule that only resolves back to name. This rule should be eliminated
> by bison during the build process anyway, so I see no problem adding it. It
> does make the ecpg changes way smaller though. Is this okay with you?

Sure, that one didn't bother me.  It was the FORWARD/BACKWARD decomposition
that looked unnecessary (as your tests seem to bear out).
        regards, tom lane