[HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX
От
Tom Lane
Тема
[HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX
Дата
Msg-id
15883.1504278595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Missing SIZE_MAX Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Commit 2e70d6b5e added a dependency on SIZE_MAX to libpq/fe_exec.c. According to C99 and recent POSIX, that symbol should be provided by , but SUS v2 (POSIX 2001) doesn't require to exist at all ... and I now notice that gaur/pademelon doesn't have it, and unsurprisingly is failing to compile fe_exec.c. We have a workaround for that symbol in timezone/private.h: #ifndef SIZE_MAX #define SIZE_MAX ((size_t) -1) #endif and a bit of grepping finds other places that are using the (size_t) -1 trick explicitly. So what I'm tempted to do is move the above stanza into c.h. Any objections? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата: