Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Дата
Msg-id 15870.1282490621@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> We often mention that we do vacuum freeze for anti-wraparound vacuum,
> but not for pg_clog file removal, which is the primary trigger for
> autovacuum vacuum freezing.  I have added the attached documentation
> patch for autovacuum_freeze_max_age;  back-patched to 9.0.

This patch does not actually seem like an improvement.  The paragraph is
all about transaction age, but you've inserted something entirely
unrelated, and not only that but chosen to make the unrelated thing seem
like the major consequence and anti-wraparound an afterthought.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More vacuum stats
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fw: patch for pg_ctl.c to add windows service start-type