"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There are two things here. One having a default value 8.2 currently
> doesn't
I'm not really convinced by this argument. pg_autovacuum was never
designed to be user-friendly; it is designed to be the back end storage
for something that *is* user-friendly (which we have not got yet).
I would say that smarts about defaults ought to go into whatever code
you are creating that inserts into pg_autovacuum.
regards, tom lane