Tom Lane-2 wrote
> Fujii Masao <
> masao.fujii@.nttdata
> > writes:
>> Does anyone object to this patch? I'm thinking to commit it separetely
>> at first before committing the planning_counter_in_pg_stat_statements
>> patch.
>
> I took a quick look through v9-0001-Pass-query-string-to-the-planner.patch
> and it's fine by me. It also matches up with something I've wanted to
> do for awhile, which is to make the query string available during
> planning and execution so that we can produce error cursors for
> run-time errors, when relevant.
>
> [...]
>
> regards, tom lane
Great !
Good news ;o)
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html