Tom Lane said:
> I was thinking something more like a CREATE ENUM TYPE command that
> specifically lists the enum values, and some extension of that to cater
> for tagged types, and the values are put into a system catalog that the
> user doesn't manipulate directly. I don't see why it's a good idea to
> put control of the backing table in the user's hands.
Me either. I like the sound of this.
cheers
andrew