Nit: "Immutable" should be "pure"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От PG Doc comments form
Тема Nit: "Immutable" should be "pure"
Дата
Msg-id 157313627814.14272.6307248648194149757@wrigleys.postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Nit: "Immutable" should be "pure"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-createindex.html
Description:

The adjective "immutable" describing the functions and operators used in an
index (see two occurrences in doc snippet below) is incorrect and should be
replaced with "pure". Both "pure" and "immutable" are in popular lexicon now
because of the interest in functional programming, so conflating the two can
happen, but the word immutable applies to data and pure applies to
functions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function. 

From the CREATE INDEX doc:
All functions and operators used in an index definition must be “immutable”,
that is, their results must depend only on their arguments and never on any
outside influence (such as the contents of another table or the current
time). This restriction ensures that the behavior of the index is
well-defined. To use a user-defined function in an index expression or WHERE
clause, remember to mark the function immutable when you create it.

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: auto_explain.log_min_duration is limit for nested statement
Следующее
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
Сообщение: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced