Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15666.1010091097@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> I assume you want to reference id, so you'd need to do something like:
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t_id_key ON t(id);
Do we allow that (defining an index on a view)? [ tries it ]
Apparently so :-(
I would argue that this should be disallowed, since it does not do
anything useful and can only mislead people into thinking that it
has some effect.
> This is a hacky sort of way to do it (we allow you to make the internal
> form that a unique constraint has via create index even on views which
> I don't believe would ever be used :( ) and may not continue working
> forever.
Since triggers on a view won't do anything either, I don't see how one
could expect REFERENCES to a view to work. The system ought to reject
all this stuff as unimplemented.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: