Re: misbehaving planer?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: misbehaving planer? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15619.1161357966@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | misbehaving planer? (Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: misbehaving planer?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I have a setup in which a table has been partitioned into 30 partitions on
> type (1 -30), however no matter what I do i can't make the planner try to use
> constraint exclusion on it.
Do you have constraint_exclusion turned on? What are the check
constraints on the other children of tbl_ps? This example doesn't
really show whether the planner is misbehaving or not.
The multiple-partial-index setup on tbl_ps_type_1 looks pretty silly to
me... it seems unlikely to buy anything except extra planning overhead.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: