Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
Дата
Msg-id 1555.980007721@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?  ("rob" <rob@cabrion.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
Список pgsql-general
"rob" <rob@cabrion.com> writes:
> currval returns error unless nextval has been called at least once in the
> session.

> I use <seq>.last_value

> Perhaps I'm fooling myself

Yes, you are, unless you never have more than one client attached to
your database.  last_value will return whatever value was last assigned
by any backend, therefore you might not get the value that was inserted
into your tuple, but someone else's.

The point about currval being initially undefined seems moot if what
you're using it for is to recover the serial number that was assigned to
a tuple you just inserted ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Seymour
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: couple of general questions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_sendmail function compile problem