В письме от 25 января 2018 11:29:34 пользователь Tom Lane написал:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, maybe the right answer is to address that. It's clear to me
> >> why that would happen if we store these things as reloptions on the
> >> toast table, but can't they be stored on the parent table?
> >
> > Actually, Nikolay provided a possible solution: if you execute ALTER
> > TABLE SET (toast.foobar = xyz), and a toast table doesn't exist, create
> > one at that point.
>
> That adds a lot of overhead if you never actually need the toast table.
I think this overhead case is not that terrible if it is properly warned ;-)
> Still, maybe it's an appropriate amount of effort compared to the size
> of the use-case for this.
If you came to some final conclustion, please close the commiffest item with
"Return with feedback" resolution, and I write another patch...
--
Do code for fun.