Re: Missing array support

Joe Conway  writes:
> So array[] should produce '{}' of (an array) type determined by the 
> context? OK -- seems easy enough.

Is it?  I think we'd decided that this could only reasonably be handled
by creating a datatype representing array-of-UNKNOWN.  I'm afraid to do
that because I think it might allow the parser's type resolution
algorithms to follow paths we will not like.  Perhaps it can be made to
work, but I think it will require some careful study.
		regards, tom lane