Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options

Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> But security labels are a nice idea, will think about it. AFAICs there's
> no builtin subdivision within the label for one provider which is a bit
> of a shame but solvable. The biggest issue I see is that it essentially
> seems to require that the provider is in
> {shared,local}_preload_libraries? You can't restore into a server
> otherwise afaics?

Well, if you want to validate the settings then you pretty much have to
require that in some form.
        regards, tom lane