Re: Building PL/Perl without libperl.so fails

How about FreeBSD 5.0?

FreeBSD 4.x has libperl.so, 5.0 only has libperl.a

/Palle

--On torsdag, januari 02, 2003 15.27.31 -0500 Tom Lane  
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn  writes:
>> I'd rather link libplperl with a static libperl.a than adding a shared
>> libperl.so to the perl port. Can this be done, or will something break?
>
> It will not work unless your platform is one where PIC code generation
> is the default, so that the contents of libperl.a are amenable to
> inclusion into a .so library.
>
> 			regards, tom lane