Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Indeed, this could go.  There is a recursive call for views, but in
> order to maintain compatibility with that we can just remove one
> function and move the second to use a regclass as argument, like the
> attached, while removing setLastTid().  Any thoughts?

Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility,
I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea.  It maybe risks
breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice
any improved ease-of-use.

            regards, tom lane