Hi,
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2018, 10:12 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:14 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 12/28/18 12:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 03:46:48PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > >> On 12/27/18 11:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> Should we double-check with packagers that this won't cause a problem?
> > >>> Though the fact that it's done in a major release should make it
> > >>> perfectly fine I think -- and it's a smaller change than when we did all
> > >>> those xlog->wal changes...
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I think it makes little sense to not rename the tool now. I'm pretty
> > >> sure we'd end up doing that sooner or later anyway, and we'll just live
> > >> with a misnamed tool until then.
> > >
> > > Do you think that a thread Would on -packagers be more adapted then?
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understand the question. Of course, asking
> > over at -packagers won't hurt, but my guess is the response will be it's
> > not a big deal from the packaging perspective.
>
> I think a heads- up in the way of "planning to change it, now's the
> time to yell" is the reasonable thing.
Renaming applications shouldn't be a problem unless they have to be
moved from one binary package to another. I assume all packagers ship
all client/server binaries in one package, respectively (and not e.g. a
dedicated postgresql-11-pg_test_fsync package), this should only be a
matter of updating package metadata.
In any case, it should be identical to the xlog->wal rename.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael.banck@credativ.de
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt
folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz