Re: Range types

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I also have to say that I'm very skeptical of the argument
> that there is only a small list of types people will want this for.

I'm not sure that anyone has argued that.  I did suggest that there
might be a small list of types for which we should provide discrete
behavior (ie, with next/previous functions) and the rest could have
continuous behavior (without that assumption).  But I quite agree
that we want both types of ranges.
        regards, tom lane