Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> The history here is that originally I was intending to have these
> functions documented, and so the descriptions were made to match the
> operator descriptions, so that we didn't get a failure on this test.
> Later we decided not to document them as part of last release's
> bike-shedding, but the function descriptions didn't get changed / removed.
Ah. I suppose there's no way to cross-check the state of the function's
pg_description comment against whether it has SGML documentation :-(
regards, tom lane