Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
| От | Joshua Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 154479001.271789.1301102568211.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > Personally I'd vote for *not* having any such dangerous semantics as > that. We should have learned better by now from plpgsql experience. > I think the best idea is to throw error for ambiguous references, > period. As a likely heavy user of this feature, I agree with Tom here. I really don't want the column being silently preferred inSQL functions, when PL/pgSQL functions are throwing an error. I'd end up spending hours debugging this. Also, I don't understand why this would be a dump/reload issue if $1 and $2 continue to work. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: