Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3
Дата
Msg-id 15437.1508942075@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3  (Stefan Tzeggai <tzeggai@empirica-systeme.de>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3
Список pgsql-bugs
Stefan Tzeggai <tzeggai@empirica-systeme.de> writes:
> I can reproduce a segfault by executing a query.

That sounds like a bug, all right, but you've not provided enough
detail for anyone else to reproduce it.  A self-contained test
case would be the best thing.

If you can't provide that, it's possible that a stack trace from
the core dump would be enough info to diagnose the problem, but
no promises ...

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend
        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stefan Tzeggai
Дата:
Сообщение: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC callsvery much