Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Дата
Msg-id 15426.1075482835@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The trick is to somehow record all files modified since the last
> checkpoint, and open/fsync/close each one.   My idea is to stat() each
> file in each directory and compare the modify time to determine if the
> file has been modified since the last checkpoint.

This seems a complete non-starter, as stat() generally has at best
one-second resolution on mod times, even if you assume that the kernel
keeps mod time fully up-to-date at all times.  In any case, it's
difficult to believe that stat'ing everything in a database directory
will be faster than keeping track of it for ourselves.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Lamb
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mixing threaded and non-threaded
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mixing threaded and non-threaded