Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Maybe. �But if that's the approach we want to use, let's just call it
>> pg_erand48 in the code, and dispense with the alias macros as well as
>> all vestiges of configure support.
> Works for me. Just to confirm, that means we'd also change GEQO to
> use pg_erand48().
Right, that's what I was thinking.
regards, tom lane