Re: Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15331.1261409887@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs
Re: Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> The logic behind this seems fine except in the case of dropping a database.
>> There you very well might have a open connection without an open snapshot.
> Perhaps the simplest fix is to ensure that drop database gets a snapshot?
I confess to not having followed the thread closely, but why is DROP
DATABASE special in this regard? Wouldn't we soon find ourselves
needing every utility command to take a snapshot?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: