Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15329.1193492170@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> Why new calling convention? I would to support byref variables and
>> then I have to carry memory context info ... and maybe some others
> I think first you have to invent something for the by-ref parameter to refer
> to.
Most of that sounded to me like a proposal to re-invent ecpg. If there
were such a large demand for doing things that way, there would be many
more users of ecpg than bare libpq. AFAICT, though, *very* few people
use ecpg.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: