Re: Compile 14.1 in EL5.8

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> ... I wondered about also removing the leftover comment
> "We assume that any system that has Linux epoll() also has Linux
> signalfd()" which was my attempt to explain that there wasn't a
> separate configure check for signalfd.h, but I guess the sentence is
> still true in a more general sense, so we can just leave it there.

Oh, I didn't notice that comment, or I probably would have tweaked it.
Perhaps along the line of "there are too few systems that have epoll
and not signalfd to justify maintaining a separate code path"?

            regards, tom lane