Re: pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От legrand legrand
Тема Re: pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading
Дата
Msg-id 1526407637627-0.post@n3.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-docs
The same should be noted for auto_explain as described here
  
www.postgresql-archive.org/Statements-that-time-out-are-not-considered-here-td6006753.html

As you, I was quite confused that cancelled queries where not taken into
account,
I first consider total_time, and mean_time in a second step (so durations of
timeout statements doesn't seem a problem here to me).

Here is an other discussion that could be interesting:
www.postgresql-archive.org/pg-stat-statements-how-to-catch-non-successfully-finished-statements-td6018801.html

Regards
PAscal





--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-docs-f2165602.html


В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
Сообщение: Incorrect description of the WITH CHECK in the row security can leadto the security issue
Следующее
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
Сообщение: Missing documentation for FETCH FIRST in chapter 7.6