Re: We've broken something in error recovery

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: We've broken something in error recovery
Дата
Msg-id 15246.1264282552@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: We've broken something in error recovery  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> #5  0x501f48 in AtEOXact_GUC (isCommit=-86 '�', nestLevel=84) at guc.c:3907

> This looks like maybe a corrupted stack - the args to AtEOXact_GUC at 
> that location in xact.c are hardwired.

No, that's just a fairly typical behavior of debugging with -O greater
than zero --- the registers holding those parameter values got recycled
for something else.  This is a rather old version of gdb and it doesn't
always print <<value optimized away>> when it should.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: commit fests
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when waiting for buffer pin.