Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
I wrote:
> I think this is more or less committable, and then we could get
> back to the original question of whether it's worth tweaking
> pg_restore's seek-vs-scan behavior.

And done.  Dimitrios, could you re-do your testing against current
HEAD, and see if there's still a benefit to tweaking pg_restore's
seek-vs-read decisions, and if so what's the best number?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: