Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com> writes:
> Index Scan using new_idx_testimonials_userid on testimonials
> (cost=0.00..157.78 rows=1 width=9) (actual time=8809.715..8809.715
> rows=0 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((user_id)::text = 'superman'::text)
> Filter: ((title_encrypted)::text = 'b333dc1b0992cb8c70b58a418211389a'::text)
> Total runtime: 8809.750 ms
This is using the index to fetch the rows that match user_id = 'superman',
and then testing each fetched row to see if it has the desired value of
title_encrypted. The fact that hardly any rows pass the filter test
tells nearly nothing about how long this should be expected to run.
The rather high estimated cost suggests that the planner thinks there
are several dozen rows matching the index condition, and the actual
runtime suggests that there are actually hundred or thousands of 'em.
If so, your problem is that you need a different index. I'd bet on an
index on title_encrypted being more useful for this query than the one
on user_id; or you could experiment with a two-column index.
regards, tom lane