Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm almost inclined to think that
> we should be trying to get rid of heap_open() altogether; there are
> already plenty of places that assume that opening the relation is as
> good as opening the heap, so I don't think there'd be any real loss of
> abstraction.
Or, perhaps, restrict it to open actual heaps (ie, relkind 'r')?
I think that if you count, you'll find the vast majority of heap_open
calls are really opening system catalogs. So I'd just as soon have
a relkind check there for sanity's sake, not to mention that renaming
them all creates a lot of unnecessary code churn.
IMO it would be sensible for heap_open to insist on a heap, index_open
to insist on an index, and for anything else, use relation_open and
BYO relkind check. There are a few common patterns (eg "does relation
have storage") that we should abstract somehow, but it might be better
to provide separate relkind-check routines than to invent xxx_open.
regards, tom lane