Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
Дата
Msg-id 1508304.1601832989@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation  (Cherio <cherio@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sun, Oct  4, 2020 at 04:18:43PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> The following SQL worked in versions 9 through 12. It is throwing an error
>> in version 13.

> Uh, I am able to reproduce the error in PG _12_ as well, and I am sure
> it is related to this change in PG 12:
    
>     Allow common table expressions (CTEs) to be inlined into the outer query
>     (Andreas Karlsson, Andrew Gierth, David Fetter, Tom Lane)

Indeed.  The planner now inlines the WITH query, allowing
"CAST(exp_days.days || ' days' AS interval)" to be folded to a constant,
whereupon you get an error since indeed ' days' isn't valid interval
input.

Sorry, I reject the position that this is a bug.  It was something of
an implementation artifact that you didn't get this error before.
As of v12, we provide explicit control over whether a WITH query can
be inlined or not, and you need to use that control if you have a
query that's dependent on inlining not happening.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
Следующее
От: Cherio
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation