Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> writes:
> On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Based on that, and past discussions, and things we've tried in the past,
>> and gut feeling, and so on, it looks like Request Tracker would appear
>> to be the next best thing to consider trying out. What do people think
>> about that?
> I'd be more optimistic that debbugs, or an adaption thereof, might more
> nearly fit into the workflow.
Yeah, that's my impression as well.
regards, tom lane