Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??

Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org> writes:
> howe=# select p.oid, n.nspname, pg_get_userbyid(p.proowner), proname
> from pg_proc as p, pg_namespace as n where pg_table_is_visible(p.oid);

> However, this situation lead me into another issue. The new conversion
> functions (utf8_to_big5, iso_to_alt, etc.) appear as listed in every
> new scheme. Is this correct ? Shouldn't them be listed only in
> pg_catalog? 

They would be, if you had remembered the join condition ;-)
where ... and p.pronamespace = n.oid
        regards, tom lane