Re: LLVM / clang
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LLVM / clang |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15062.1276177969@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: LLVM / clang (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LLVM / clang
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
> on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
> with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
> understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all
> that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result.
> The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is
> apparently not *exactly* the same.
There's a buildfarm animal using llvm-gcc, and it passes just fine ...
so the float8 failure sounds to me like another integration problem.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: