Re: AIX support
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: AIX support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1501929.1769730517@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: AIX support (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: AIX support
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Should any of these be backpatched, actually? Based on the lack of
> complaints, it does not seem so to me, but if we are targetting a
> backpatch of the AIX port, that would be required.
There's no plan to backpatch the AIX port ... but if we can clean
up this include-path mess not too invasively, I think it might be
a good idea to back-patch that much. I'm concerned that confusion
between <float.h> and utils/float.h might be a problem on other
platforms too.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: