On Monday 25 of January 2016 14:46:14 Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Pavel> there is no demand for that package in Linux
>
> Pease, read again:
> Vladimir>add one more build step: download relevant
> Vladimir>sources, build them
>
> Where do you see "adding new package" there?
Right, I missed that, sorry. But this requires new package -- it is new
upstream, new license -- I do not want to cross the border of
"good packagers group"..
pgjdbc-parent-poms are (probably) fine, because it is the same upstream as
pgjdbc, has the same license -- and to be honest, I guess those two git
repositories will be merged into one git and tarball in future anyway. If
not, pgjdbc main repo could be made self-standing sooner or later.
And similarly to osgi stuff, there is no demand for the separate package
existence.
Pavel