Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14e101c3353a$894101a0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> this arguments are quite academic. You what! > On one side, this could be > restricted, thats what pg_depends is good for (this already happens for > inherited tables). > On the other side, how often do you rename columns or tables? You what! > On mssql, nobody cares. You what! > If you fool around with names, your views will > be broken without warning. pgsql could be better easily. > I'd really prefer to have full view sources available rather than the > gimmick of stable views despite renamed cols/tabs. Gimmick! You what!!!!!!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: