On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:19:42 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:09:18 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hi Hiroshi,
> >
> > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 12:19:01 PM CEST Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> > > On 2016/06/28 17:52, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:36:43 AM CEST Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > > >> Did any platform succeed (e.g. Intel64)?
> > > >
> > > > No. Looks like x86_64/i686 is in the best condition, we apply only one
> > > > downstream patch in Fedora (revert of the MONEY [1] fix which I believe should
> > > > be reverted upstream) and then the testsuite succeeds.
> > > >
> > > > To build on armv7hl, we apply [2].
> > >
> > > Could you try the attached patch on armv7hl?
> >
> > of course. Submitted build (for i686, x86_64 and armv7hl):
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15001892
> > .. and all arches passed testsuite, thanks!
> >
> > There is just the remaining MONEY [1] revert patch.
>
> FYI:
>
> aarch64 passes too:
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3639510
>
> s390 still fails:
> http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2297311
ppc64 fails, ppc64le (little endian) succeeds.
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549998
Looks like remaining failure is big-endian related?
Pavel