Re: pg_dump: bug?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump: bug? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14987.1012627774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | pg_dump: bug? (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump: bug?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> Now, is this a bug?
Good question. I don't think this is the only example of a
non-self-consistent situation that could arise after a series of
ALTER commands; I'm not sure that we can or should try to solve
every one.
However, it does seem that a superuser should be able to create
databases on behalf of users who can't themselves do so. So
I'd say that we need a "CREATE DATABASE foo WITH OWNER bar" option.
Then pg_dumpall should emit such critters rather than the
circumlocution it uses now.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: