Re: Join Table
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Join Table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14976.1099328858@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Join Table (T E Schmitz <mailreg@numerixtechnology.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
T E Schmitz <mailreg@numerixtechnology.de> writes:
> CREATE TABLE SUPPLY
> (
> ITEM_FK integer NOT NULL,
> CONTACT_FK integer NOT NULL,
> COST numeric (7,2),
> PRIMARY KEY (ITEM_FK,CONTACT_FK)
> );
> Question: is it necessary/advisable to create an index for the ITEM_FK
> column? Or is this redundantbecause this column is already one of the PK
> columns?
The PK index will be usable for searches on ITEM_FK alone (though *not*
for searches on CONTACT_FK alone --- a moment's thought about the index
sort order should convince you why). It would be marginally less
efficient for this purpose than a dedicated index on ITEM_FK. But unless
your use of this table is almost all searches and hardly any
modifications, adding a dedicated index is probably a net loss due to
the added update costs.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: