Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> writes:
> You seem to know what you're doing, but just in case we missed something as this is strange enough to have even the
devsscratching their heads. The rows are there, so it _has_ to be an index or a transaction visibility issue...
The successful fetch-by-ctid test seems to have eliminated the
transaction-visibility-problem theory too. The whole thing is
passing strange at this point.
regards, tom lane